A Florida law restricting real estate purchases by individuals from China has been upheld by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, rejecting a legal challenge. The law, a key initiative of Governor Ron DeSantis, aims to curb the influence of the Chinese government and Communist Party within the state. Opponents argue the law is discriminatory and unfairly targets individuals based on their national origin.
Key Takeaways
- A federal appeals court has upheld a Florida law that restricts property purchases by individuals from China.
- The law, SB 264, prohibits individuals "domiciled" in China from buying property in Florida, with narrow exceptions.
- Critics, including the ACLU, argue the law is discriminatory and violates equal protection rights.
- The court clarified that the law does not apply to Chinese immigrants who reside in Florida and intend to stay indefinitely.
Legal Challenge and Court Ruling
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of a lawsuit challenging the law. The plaintiffs, including individuals from China residing in the U.S. on various visas or seeking asylum, contended that the law violates constitutional equal-protection rights and the federal Fair Housing Act. They also argued that the state law is preempted by federal legislation. However, the appeals court found that the plaintiffs lacked the legal standing to challenge the law.
Provisions of the Law
Florida’s Senate Bill 264, signed into law by Governor Ron DeSantis, specifically targets individuals whose "domicile" is in China. These individuals are generally prohibited from purchasing real estate in Florida. An exception allows for the purchase of one residential property under two acres, provided it is not within five miles of a military base and the buyer holds a non-tourist visa. Similar, though less restrictive, rules apply to individuals from Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Syria.
Arguments Against the Law
Civil liberties organizations, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have strongly criticized the law, labeling it as discriminatory and reminiscent of historical "alien land laws" that targeted Asian immigrants. They argue that the law unfairly conflates individuals of Chinese origin with the actions of the Chinese government and creates a chilling effect on Asian Americans in Florida. The ACLU has stated its commitment to continuing the fight against such laws.
Impact on the Real Estate Market
Despite the legal challenges and the law’s intent, data from the Miami Association of Realtors indicated that Chinese citizens remained among the most interested international buyers in South Florida real estate prior to the appeals court ruling. The law’s enforcement has been subject to legal challenges, which temporarily halted its implementation. Once fully enacted, the law could also affect purchases of agricultural land and properties near military installations by citizens of several listed countries.
Clarification on Domicile
While upholding the law, the appeals court provided a clarification that the restrictions do not apply to Chinese immigrants who are domiciled in Florida and intend to remain there indefinitely. This distinction is crucial for individuals who have established residency and long-term ties to the state.